Publication year:
1995
This article addresses criticisms that PRA raises too many expectations, and that communities should not simply be used as guinea-pigs for testing methods. It argues that these criticisms are only valid when planning is inadequate and there is a lack of transparency in groups working with communities. Further, it argues that raising expectations is actually an objective of the PRA process.
Interest groups:
NGO and other community project and programme planners.
Pages:
17-19
Publisher reference:
International Institute for Environment and Development