Please Stop the PRA RRA Rah

Publication year: 
1995

This article criticises some RRA and PRA for 'faddism': in fact it is neither new, revolutionary nor more than one useful set of research tools amongst many others. Above all, it is not an end in itself. It can turn out to be much like the top-down approach its proponents sought to avoid, e.g. if applied in a standardised manner, if it fails to address issues which emerge from the PRA, or if its application suffers from hidden biases. Many of the examples and issues raised in this paper usefully caution against 'bad' PRA.

Source publication information
Journal Title: 
Out of the Shell
Volume: 
5(1)
Pages: 
pp.17-24.
Publisher
Nell Pelkey, Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA

How to find this resource

Shelfmark in IDS Resource Centre
A : Participatory Approaches : Critical reflections 1585
Post date: 01/01/2000 - 00:00